The charity, in the Gants Hill area of Redbridge, never responded to the campaign, and the donation link remains live on its website – though the wording has subtly changed from “donation of equipment needed by soldiers of Israel” to “donation in honour of our soldiers and the safe return of the hostages”. (The Chabad Lubavitch Centre did not respond to our requests for comment.) What’s more, Redbridge Council has spent more than £2,000 removing Palestinian flags from main roads after receiving a letter from the lobby group UK Lawyers for Israel.

But the group still considers its actions a success. Members typically replace the flags within 24 hours in a sort of cat-and-mouse game, and continue to picket the charity, part of a larger network across north-east London that supports local Jewish communities. Sooner or later, the Redbridge Palestine Solidarity Network hopes, the Chabad Lubavitch Centre will reconsider its backing for the Israeli military.

“The support for Palestine in our area is clear,” said the group member, who asked not to be named. “We won’t stand by while councils, companies and charities are complicit in genocide and politicians are failing to speak up or represent us as they should.”

Israel was accused of perpetrating genocide in Gaza last month at the International Court of Justice by South Africa, which Israel denies. The court stopped short of calling for a ceasefire, but ordered Israel to “prevent” acts that could amount to genocide. A ruling on whether Israel has actually been committing genocide could take far longer.

The flags, and the picketing of the charity’s offices, represent just one of many small acts of resistance taking place across the UK and the world under the ‘Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions’ (BDS) umbrella. BDS targets specific public bodies and private companies accused of aiding what it calls ‘Israeli apartheid’.

Since it began in 2005, the BDS campaign has attracted high-profile supporters including archbishop Desmond Tutu in South Africa, US politicians like Ilhan Omar, and authors from Arundhati Roy in India to Benjamin Zephaniah in the UK.

But the movement has also attracted significant pushback from Israel’s supporters, particularly in the UK and US. The ramifications of an ‘anti-boycott’ bill currently making its way through Britain’s House of Lords are likely to ripple beyond the UK’s shores, showing how far Israel’s allies are prepared to go in clamping down on the practice.

“Israel can only maintain military occupation and apartheid because of the complicity of governments and corporations in Britain and around the world,” said Lewis Backon, campaigns officer at the Palestine Solidarity Campaign that co-organises the weekly pro-Palestine demonstrations that have been taking place across the UK since October.

“BDS gives us a strategy to turn our rage into meaningful action. It is a way in which people in Britain and elsewhere can retract our tacit approval of Israel.”

The campaign calls for boycotts of a small number of companies where it believes it can have a maximum impact – and it calls on a larger list of companies to divest from the state of Israel. Since October, leaders of the movement from Palestinian civil society have also endorsed what they call “organic boycott targets” which BDS itself did not initiate – McDonald’s, Pizza Hut and Burger King. 

“The strategy of BDS has always been about institutional divestment over consumer boycotts,” said Shabbir Lakha, a campaigner with the anti-war group Stop the War. Personal consumer boycotts in the UK are welcome, he added, but “it’s the wider organised movement around the world that’s important – essentially creating a situation where Israel is a pariah state, as are companies that directly profit from apartheid and occupation”.

Anti-boycott bill 

The “draconian” new anti-boycott bill – being considered by the UK’s House of Lords this week – is evidence that the threat of BDS is working, according to Lakha.

First introduced to the British Parliament in the summer by the Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities, the Economic Activity of Public Bodies (Overseas Matters) Bill was originally promised in the 2019 Conservative Party manifesto in a pledge to “ban public bodies from imposing their own direct or indirect boycotts, disinvestment or sanctions campaigns against foreign countries”.

Israel and Palestine are the only states currently explicitly named in the legislation, whose stated aim is to stop public bodies from “pursuing their own foreign policy agenda”.

Opponents argue that, in reality, the bill itself will stop public bodies – including NHS trusts, councils, and even the government itself – achieving their environmental, ethical and international human rights obligations, by forcing them to invest in companies and states whose actions are damaging.

Amnesty International has previously said the bill “effectively grants Israel impunity at a time of flagrant breaches of international law in Gaza and the West Bank”. “Public procurement represents around 14% of the UK economy,” said Kristyan Benedict, the charity’s crisis response manager, “which provides an enormous opportunity to drive the transition to sustainable production and consumption.

“If, however, businesses believe that public bodies are unlikely to exclude them from contracts on human rights grounds, then this creates a form of moral hazard where companies that respect human rights face being undercut by those that don’t.”

The wording of the bill is “deliberately vague”, which will make it difficult to implement, in the opinion of Daan de Grefte – a legal officer at the European Centre for Legal Support, which gives legal help to Palestinian rights activists across Europe.

But the vague wording could also give rise to a wider “chilling effect”, leading people to believe it bans free expression on Palestine altogether. “It’s quite evident that the main intent of this bill is to silence politicians and others from speaking up about Palestinian rights,” said de Grefte.